No! That is not trademark infringement. The words are not the same. And you're not (on individual words like "Pokemon").
If there is a way of saying, in an easy style, created to identify the type and brand repeated only for those words that might have the style the way a problem.
For example, if I opened a restaurant called Moose Burgers and had a yellow arch style "M" in my house, probably with a few problems with McDonald's.
No! That is not trademark infringement. The words are not the same. And you're not (on individual words like "Pokemon").
If there is a way of saying, in an easy style, created to identify the type and brand repeated only for those words that might have the style the way a problem.
For example, if I opened a restaurant called Moose Burgers and had a yellow arch style "M" in my house, probably with a few problems with McDonald's.
\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ U0026lt,> First, catch-all "is not the same as" Gotta Catch'em all! "So, no problem. Secondly, I am almost sure that the company will not pursue the issue of copyright infringement for 2 shirts. So do not worry (sorry, I think it was copyrighted!) And have a nice day! ( I know you are!:)
5 comments:
No! That is not trademark infringement. The words are not the same. And you're not (on individual words like "Pokemon").
If there is a way of saying, in an easy style, created to identify the type and brand repeated only for those words that might have the style the way a problem.
For example, if I opened a restaurant called Moose Burgers and had a yellow arch style "M" in my house, probably with a few problems with McDonald's.
No! That is not trademark infringement. The words are not the same. And you're not (on individual words like "Pokemon").
If there is a way of saying, in an easy style, created to identify the type and brand repeated only for those words that might have the style the way a problem.
For example, if I opened a restaurant called Moose Burgers and had a yellow arch style "M" in my house, probably with a few problems with McDonald's.
\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ U0026lt,> First, catch-all "is not the same as" Gotta Catch'em all! "So, no problem. Secondly, I am almost sure that the company will not pursue the issue of copyright infringement for 2 shirts. So do not worry (sorry, I think it was copyrighted!) And have a nice day! ( I know you are!:)
It was not, but it is now, is willing to pay for it?, Was just a joke, but dont use their heads to ask questions like.
Talk to a lawyer
Post a Comment